RISING TIDE RAISES AWARENESS
At this year’s AADSM meeting, there was a big hullabaloo about dentists, ENTs, and scope of practice. Device manufacturers pilloried each other, and impotent jabs were thrown via social media comments. In a nutshell, a successful ENT group was collaborating with dentists to treat patients with oral appliances. Sounds like every sleep dentists’ dream, right?

Toffler suggested that “the illiterate of the 20th century won’t be those who can’t read or write, but those who can’t learn, unlearn, and relearn.” Unlearning “facts” that have been cemented via confirmation bias is very difficult for us dentists whose basic training in the science did NOT include the scientific method. This is not our fault. It is the fault of dental education. So much of what we have learned is through empirical evidence; information handed down from previous generations of dentists that quite simply lacks any scientific validity. A non-responder with oral appliance therapy does not represent a clinical error on the dentist’s part any more than a patient who doesn’t respond to a specific drug represents a clinical error on the physician’s part. Accepting this is critically important to success in dental sleep medicine.



